×
§ 12101 et seq., arguing that the statute required Wal-Mart to grant her automatic preference over other qualified applicants as a reasonable accommodation of ...
People also ask
The judgment and amount of damages awarded to Walter are supported by sufficient evidence of Wal-Mart's negligence and of Walter's resulting harm. Negligence ...
Missing: q= https% 2Fwww. 2Fcases% 2Fhuber-
Plaintiffs brought suit against Wal-Mart alleging that the company engaged in a corporate culture of discrimination against female employees in violation of ...
Missing: q= https% 3A% 2F% 2Fwww. 2Fcases% 2Fhuber-
The court of appeals affirmed and held that the instruction was proper, because it did not explicitly require the jury to find that the degree of care Wal-Mart ...
Missing: q= https% 3A% 2F% 2Fwww. 2Fcases% 2Fhuber-
(Wal-Mart) (defendant) on behalf of themselves and others for sex-based employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The female ...
Missing: q= https% 3A% 2F% 2Fwww. 2Fcases% 2Fhuber-
Dolores Howard (plaintiff) sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) (defendant) in state court for negligence. Wal-Mart removed the case to federal court under ...
Missing: q= https% 2Fwww. 2Fcases% 2Fhuber-
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 8 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.