Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect.
People also ask
Why does Wikipedia have a bad reputation?
What is the controversy with Wikipedia?
What are the disadvantages of Wikipedia?
Is Wikipedia inappropriate?
Nothing is perfect, and Wikipedia is no exception. This page enumerates user opinions on why Wikipedia is not so great. For formal criticisms, see Criticism ...
Missing: q= | Show results with:q=
In some well-documented cases, this inaccurate information continues to spread when people take it from Wikipedia and use it in books and articles.
The online encyclopedia has been criticized for its factual unreliability, principally regarding its content, presentation, and editorial processes. Studies and ...
Sep 22, 2020 · Wikipedia is very bad because anything pertains to politics has been distorted and spinned. Avoid Wikipedia at all cost except when you want to ...
Jan 20, 2022 · The mistake. In a 2005 study, Jim Giles found that Wikipedia articles had only one more inaccuracy per article than the Encyclopaedia Britannica ...
Aug 6, 2021 · I would say that all articles published by the media are inherently unreliable, but that's up to you. Academic papers are often locked behind a ...
Nov 4, 2021 · Wikipedia can be a tool for better media literacy Research suggests Australian children are not getting sufficient instruction in spotting fake ...
Rating
(200)
Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source you should cite in your research papers. Wikipedia allows all kinds ...
Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of its articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias.
Related searches